Archive for November 6th, 2009

Are the Conservatives in Northern Ireland ‘Going Native’?

Earlier in the week recent Conservative recruit, Deirdre Nelson, wrote a letter to the Belfast Telegraph wherein she referred to the “arrangement between these two great parties” – the two Parties being the Conservative Party and the Ulster Unionist Party.  Now perhaps I missed something, but I can’t quite recall a time when the Ulster Unionist Party – indeed any of Northern Ireland’s political Parties – was “great”. 

Now one could argue that no political Parties are great.  Political Parties are a very imperfect way to do democracy.  They have a tendency to stifle freedom of thought.  Party politicians acting in conscience, rather than to suit the collective, are few and far between.  I don’t like collectives – and it’s a key reason why I dislike football teams and religions. 

However, I’d have to admit that the Conservative Party could probably, rightly, be described as “great”.  After all, it’s the Party of Peel, Churchill, Disraeli and Thatcher.  But the UUP?  Great?

The UUP is not even a political Party in the true sense of the term. 

Let’s seek a definition of political party and then decide whether the Ulster Unionist Party passes the test.  If it fails to pass the litmus test of political party then, de facto, it is impossible for it to be great.  Yes?

Here’s the Wikipedia definition:

A political party is a political organization that seeks to attain and maintain political power within government, usually by participating in electoral campaigns. Parties often espouse an expressed ideology or vision bolstered by a written platform with specific goals, forming a coalition among disparate interests.

Well I think we can safely say that the UUP has never sought political power within government – after all it has been in existence since the home rule crisis and has never had the opportunity, until recently, of having any say in the government of the United Kingdom.  Even now it refuses to dismantle itself and encourage its members to join the Conservative Party – so that those members could become active in a UK wide political Party that aspires to form the next government.  Instead it trundles along competing with the Conservative Party for members, organising its fund raising campaigns, wittering on about parades, and protestantism, and Ulster.

And what about the UUP’s expressed ideology or vision?  It has none.  The Party has never really understood what it stands for (apart from the “Union”).  Unionism is not an ideology – despite the fact that UUP members would like to think its is.  The founder of modern Unionism, Carson, never wanted Ulster Unionism to set itself outside mainstream UK political debate and never wanted a Stormont government.  He just wanted Northern Ireland to be like the rest of the UK.  Oh and he wasn’t too fond of the Orange Order either…”all old bones and rotten rags.”

And what about the coalition of disparate interests?  Well it ticks that box I suppose.  I gather UUP MLAs are split down the middle in terms of the deal with the Conservatives.  South Belfast UUP have declared UDI and, today, the UUP Health Minister attended a trade union organised rally held in Belfast to protest against cuts to the health service (yes, you did read that correctly). 

In short, the UUP can barely be defined as a political Party, let alone a great one. 

Therefore it begs the question, are the Conservatives in Northern Ireland going a bit soft?  The Conservative/UUP deal is not a meeting of equals or two ‘great’ parties.  It’s about the removal of a sectarian brand from Northern Ireland politics.  Conservatives here should not forget that.

House of Lords Debates Humanism Inclusion in BBC Output

You may be interested in Wednesday night’s debate on the BBC and Humanism in the Moses Room, House of Lords, called by Lord Harrison.

In that debate, several members of the All Party Humanist Group spoke, making the case for inclusion of humanism in BBC broadcasting, and of humanists as contributors to Thought for the Day.

The debate was especially timely as the BBC Trust is today continuing its deliberations on these issues. The Government’s response to the debate was that it ‘Hoped the BBC was listening’.  I’ll keep readers up to date re. outcome.

However, when reading Hansard relating to the debate I very much enjoyed this:

7.35 pm

Lord Kilclooney: My Lords, I had not intended to speak in this debate, but having heard some of the contributions, I find it very interesting. I speak as a happy Christian, an Ulster Protestant and a great friend of Islam.

The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Colwyn): My Lords, I think that the noble Lord has missed the opportunity to speak in the gap, which was before the noble Lord, Lord Taverne. I stand open to suggestion.

Lord Kilclooney: I was going to be very brief. Perhaps the humanists still want to hear my contribution.

Noble Lords: No.

____________

Very interesting to know that Lord Kilclooney defines himself as a “happy Christian, an Ulster Protestant and a great friend of Islam.”  Now we know.  But even better that he was shut up by a bunch of All-Party Atheists!


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 29 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers