Archive for January, 2010



UUP/Conservative Partnership at Breaking Point?

I suspect that Peter McCann, the Conservative parliamentary “nominee” for South Belfast, must be getting somewhat frustrated with the slow progress from the UUP on joint candidate selection. 

I hear on the grapevine that David Cameron was hoping to announce the 18 Northern Ireland Conservative candidates weeks ago – but that stone-walling by the UUP has resulted in a Cameron visit to Northern Ireland being postponed twice. 

So the Conservative nominees are beginning to get very annoyed – especially Peter.

Evidence of this can be seen on Peter McCann’s new Facebook group, Peter McCann for Parliament.

Here’s how Peter describes the progress to date on his selection.  I’ve highlighted the key sections in bold. [Editor's note - I gather the copy on the Facebook page has now been altered.  What appears below is the original copy as it appeared at time of writing of this post]…

2008 Conservative Party leader David Cameron calls for a new generation of politicians to come forward to change politics in Northern Ireland. Cameron is seeking to break the sectarian and sexist stranglehold that is a cancer infecting all levels of life.

The Conservative Party agrees an electoral pact with the Ulster Unionists. Together they fight the European Election.

April 2009, Peter McCann joins the Conservative Party.

A Tory funded campaign in the European Election returns Jim Nicholson in second place in the count. Nicholson takes the Conservative Whip in the European Parliament. The DUP are well beaten into third place.

The Conservative and Unionist Pact continues for the Westminster Election, again it is funded by the Tory Party.

Peter is approached by Shadow Secretary of State for NI, Owen Paterson, and recruited to enter elected politics.

Peter is selected by the Conservative Party as qualified and suitable to serve as a Conservative Party Member of Parliament in June 2009.

In October 2009 Peter is chosen by South Belfast Conservative Association as their nominee for the next Westminster election.

January 2010, Peter is still waiting for the UUP to agree the joint candidate for South Belfast. Time ticks on and the election draws closer.

Stormont and Pink Bunnies

A few posts back I complained that politicians here had little to no understanding of business.  In response to this most of the “negotiators” in the policing and justice talks at Stormont have decided to refer only to “product”.  The use of this word is to convey that their intense negotiating efforts are focused on the creation of a great thing…a monumental, sculptured and highly desirable object.  And, for some reason, the only thing, the only object, the only “product” that my mind will introduce when they make reference to it, is a giant Duracell bunny.  There it is, towering above the Carson memorial with Ulster’s cast of political characters standing around it, looking proud. 

Perhaps a psychiatrist could help explain why it is that in the midst of yet another assembly near-death experience, when earnest, and dour, Unionists and Nationalists are huddled in crisis talks and coin this this new product word, used to imply – I think – a draft agreement, all I can think of is a big, pink fluffy bunny.  I dunno. 

Gregory Campbell, speaking on Radio Ulster this morning, went even further.  He talked about wanting to see and touch the product.  And there it happened again.  This vision popped into my mind of Gregory’s skinny little thin-lipped face pulled, at last, into a tight smile, hugging his big, stupid-looking pink bunny. 

But as Gregory proceeded through his interview this morning on Good Morning Ulster, the language got more contorted.  Product was introduced time and time again, interspersed with references to community this and community that and it became obvious that there was some type of anorakical debating point being introduced for the benefit of Sinn Fein.  The lexicon and the double-speak became so inpenetrable that not even the pink bunny could help me.

The Secular Dividend: Who’s Up for It?

Andrew Rawnsley, writing in today’s Observer, argues that there might be some up-sides to Irisgate:

One of them would be to reduce the role of God in the politics of Northern Ireland…Northern Ireland is the last place in western Europe in which party allegiances are still largely determined by identity-based politics founded in rival interpretations of the Bible. The most ostentatiously and aggressively religiose of the parties is the DUP, in many ways the political wing of the Free Presbyterian church of Ulster.  Mrs Robinson was infamous for tirades against the “abomination” of gay sex, posturing which is now shown to be not only bigoted but also richly hypocritical. Verily, God is not mocked.  He reserves an especially potent lightning bolt for the bullies of the pulpit who most self-righteously claim to be the Almighty’s representative on Earth. That is a useful lesson from the parable of the first minister’s wife. It is one that may help to nudge the politics of Northern Ireland in a more secular direction.

Needless to say, I’d agree that a secular dividend would be a good one.  However, I’m not sure who (apart from myself, of course – and I’m largely ignored) is doing the nudging. 

The UUP, nor the SDLP for that matter, is hardly the new secular alternative.  The UUP is making the right noises about participation in UK government – but unless it starts putting major blue water between itself and the rest of our parochial parties, it has little chance of defining change.  Nor does there seem much resolve in the party to redefine itself as mainstream and Conservative.  It there were such resolve, the UUP would start the process towards full integration with the Conservative Party. 

Similarly, the SDLP is becoming a mini-me version of Sinn Fein.  There appears to be no resolve to define itself as a Northern Irish political party.  Its core values are all over the place.  It has no real idea what it stands for in an Irish or British context.  But whatever it is, it’s not about defining a new breed of secular politics for Northern Ireland. 

The Alliance Party is simply a basket case. 

My hope, of course, is that the Conservative candidates, when the UCUNF joint committee can get round to announcing who they are, will be refeshingly different.  I live in hope that they will refuse to use the standard phraseology of Northern Ireland politics wrapped around religious community definitions.

I also hope, of course, that some of them will be elected.  And then we might, genuinely, be nudging Northern Ireland politics in a secular direction.

Sir Allen McClay and Politics

In this excellent post by Jim Fitzpatrick of the Politics Show Jim quotes Sir Allen McClay.  Sir Allen was, without question, one of Northern Ireland’s most successful businessmen – and, sadly, died last week.  His passing was very sad news for Northern Ireland. 

Fitzpatrick refers to a factory opening.  McClay had been reluctant to have David Trimble attend.  At the time, Trimble was the local MP.  According to the article Trimble was only allowed to attend after McClay had been persuaded to do so by the Head of the Civil Service.  But with the “VIPs” duly assembled, McClay laid into the politicians:

“There’s been much talk recently about the need for decommissioning of weapons – what about the decommissioning of jobs and factories that we’ve seen throughout this country?

“That’s the decommissioning I’d like our politicians to focus on,” he said in so many words, as David Trimble went his particular colour of purple, and [Peter] Mandelson and a host of government officials went an unhealthy shade of white.

Nothing much has changed since McClay uttered those words.  People in business here succeed despite politicians often – rather than because of them.  Even young Kirk McCambley must be regretting accepting the help of a politician in setting up his venture.

Inspired by Sir Allen’s words I thought I’d have a look at the backgrounds of our MPs to try to determine what, if any, business experience they had.  I started compiling a little table.  The table made for very uninteresting reading.  The only MP who has had any business experience, as far as I can gather from the MPs’ Wikipedia entries, is David Simpson.  He worked for a meat company in the past. 

However none of our MPs has established a business or had to meet monthly pay-roll as a result of their own endeavours (although most, of course, now employ staff paid-for by the public purse).

Practical, hard-working, common-sense business people like Allen McClay have done more for this place than any politicians.  Against all the odds they have prospered, invested and reinvested. 

One of the things that impressed me most about Owen Paterson, Shadow Secretary of State, was that he made the effort to go out and meet many of Northern Ireland’s business people.  I joined him at some of these meetings.  As a former businessman himself he could empathize.  Whether our local “politicians” could hope to understand the challenges faced by local business people when they have no overt experience in business – and often distrust the very concept of capitalism – is highly unlikely.

With the exception of several of the Conservative candidates I’m not sure our next raft of MPs will be much better.

Haiti. You can help.

Please help the people of Haiti. (Pic: Telegraph)

You can donate to the Haiti earthquake appeal here.

This link will take you a secure donation page on the Disasters Emergency Committee site.

DONATE NOW

Iris and Bad Karma

Tiger Woods (Pic: Keith Allison)

Robert Pigott, the BBC’s Religious Affairs Correspondent, has written a fascinating blog post that manages to embrace the Tiger Woods scandal and Iris Robinson’s in one hit.  Therefore, as religious affairs articles go, it’s good value for money.

Pigott refers to a television panel discussion that included Brit Hume – a prominent political analyst on the Fox network.  Hume, apparently, suggested that Tiger Woods should probably convert to Christianity (he’s a Buddhist).  Hume felt that Woods would find it easier to obtain forgiveness as a Christian.  This has caused quite a storm in the US. 

Iris Robinson, handily, is an evangelical Christian.  She has made clear that forgiveness has already been provided: “I am comforted that He was able to forgive even me.”  However, despite this, she still seems to be in need of psychiatric help.  No amount of heavenly forgiveness removes all that bad karma. 

I often wonder if the reason why Christianity is so popular is because of the sin/forgiveness duality.  During the years of Northern Ireland’s troubles one often heard about convicted paramilitary thugs finding Jesus in prison.  One wonders why Jesus didn’t find them before they committed their crimes. 

Buddhists, as pointed out by Pigott in his piece, don’t really ‘do’ sin or forgiveness – because they do not peddle the idea of a supernatural being that provides forgiveness and redemption.  Rather they argue that one can live one’s life in a way that causes suffering to others – and one has to learn to improve based on an appreciation of this suffering.  In that sense there is a strong humanist core to the religion (although also a great deal of mumbo jumbo). 

My take on this is very simple.  One can live one’s life in such a way that it can get 1) very complicated; 2) very hurtful to others; 3) very legally dodgy.  All three result in stress.  Therefore it’s probably better not to have too complicated, hurt-inducing, or illegal a modus operandi - in order to avoid stress.  It’s simple.  Moreover it’s neither Christian nor Buddhist.

The Elephant in the Room

David Trimble Predicts Peter Robinson’s Resignation

Conservative peer Lord Trimble feels that Peter Robinson has reached the end of the line as First Minister. 

Speaking to the BBC, Lord Trimble said the DUP leader had “lost his authority within the party and the system”.

“If he is going to fight to clear his name, then the place to do that is from the back benches,” he said.

Shaun Woodward’s Principles

Shaun Woodward used to be a Conservative MP but now he’s a millionaire Labour MP married to the daughter of a former Conservative MP.  He’s the mouth-piece wheeled out to tut-tut over failed insurrections within Labour ranks.  He has been Northern Ireland’s largely invisible Secretary of State since 2005.  He’s visible only when he is required to try to ‘fix’ some impasse or hiatus in the “peace process”.

Married to Camilla Sainsbury, of Sainsbury supermarket fame, Shaun has a rather comfortable living.  It has been said he is the only Labour MP with a butler.  I’m not so sure.  It has also been suggested that he and his wife have a fortune of around £15m. 

What Mr Woodward does not have, however, are any discernable political principles.  His intervention in the Robinson affair shows very clearly that his political focus is always on process and never on principle, emotional response or ideology.  He also appears to assume, given his bizarre outburst today, that the political status quo is more important than any requirement for high standards in public office. 

Mr Woodward seems to have missed that the peace process is no longer a process and is now complete.  We’re now in the realm of real politics and real people – warts and all.  We can dispense with the process and just focus on the peace – and the politics. 

Politics can continue merrily with or without the involvement of a discredited First Minister.  Peace will be broken only when those who choose to disrupt the rule of law choose to do so.  The only people who can resolve “dissident” IRA violence are members of the PSNI - and people within the Republican movement who know who the terrorists are.  The peace process has nothing to do with politicians who claim to accept the rule of law and the requirement for peace. 

Shaun Woodward wants the “process” to continue and he appears to want Peter Robinson’s involvement.  Once again Mr Woodward shows just how little he knows about real politics and the very real and palpable need for ethics and standards in public service.  He is a politician that knows nothing of political principle and everything about political process. 

Thankfully, however, he will be largely ignored – and soon will be replaced.

Why Peter Robinson Must Resign

Last night, after watching the BBC Spotlight investigation into “Robinsongate” I felt it was self-evident why Peter Robinson should resign.  This morning I hear calls from senior politicians – like Sir Reg Empey, Leader of the UUP, and David Ford, Leader of the Alliance Party – that Iris Robinson should leave political office immediately.  However, that’s not enough.  The First Minister should resign and all senior politicians should call upon him to do so. 

Sir Reg, on BBC Radio Ulster this morning, was typically analytical – calling for a transcript of the programme and suggesting that investigations might be required.  However, for Sir Reg’s benefit, let me make clear why Peter Robinson must resign as First Minister.

Clause IX of the Northern Ireland Executive Ministerial Code of Conduct states that Ministers should declare any personal or business interests which may conflict with their responsibilities. The Assembly will retain a Register of Interests. Individuals must ensure that any direct or indirect pecuniary interests [my emphasis] which members of the public might reasonably think could influence their judgement are listed in the Register of Interests.”

In short, the code makes clear that all Ministers – including the First Minister – must put his public duty ahead of his private duty.  It was clear that he did not. 

Neither Peter Robinson nor his wife made the authorities aware that Iris was accepting cash donations from property developers to support her lover’s business venture.

According to last night’s programme, Peter Robinson, while he may only have discovered in March last year that his wife was having an affair, was aware that his wife had been funding Kirk McCambley. 

It would appear from last night’s programme that Mr Robinson, eventually, insisted that his wife return this money to the property developers who provided it.  However, he made no public acknowledgement, at the time he was made aware of it, that his wife was involved in Mr McCambley’s business.  He therefore breached the Ministerial Code of Conduct.

Moreover, as someone in high political office, it must surely have seemed odd to Mr Robinson that a personal friend of the Robinson family – Kirk McCambley – was considered the only suitable candidate for the Lock Keeper’s Inn by Castlereagh Council, when Mr Robinson will have been aware that Mr McCambley had been bank-rolled by his wife.  Moreover, surely questions must have arisen in Mr Robinson’s mind (unless he was fully aware of the situation) when a personal friend of his wife’s was awarded the tenancy of the Lock Keeper’s Inn by the Council – a council upon which his wife served. 

In short, if the programme was accurate last night, and Mr Robinson was aware of his wife’s pecuniary interest in Mr McCambley, and failed to highlight this, he was in breach of the Code.  He was also in breach of the Code by not making the authorities aware that his wife had failed to declare her pecuniary interest in Mr McCambley’s business to Castlereagh Council, The Northern Ireland Assembly and to the authorities at Westminster. 

If he fails to resign the Northern Ireland Executive will lose all credibility – as well as all politicians who fail to call for his resignation.

« Previous PageNext Page »


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 24 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.