Why the Labour Party and Jim Murphy are hypocrites on the Union

English: Floral Badges of the United Kingdom o...

Image via Wikipedia

Yesterday Jim Murphy, Shadow Defence Secretary, made clear that the Labour Party would be leading the charge to defend the Union in Scotland. However, he may have missed that the fact that Union he is defending is the Union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Labour conveniently ignores the fact that the Labour Party does not defend the Union here.

It is constitutionally offensive for a Party that aspires to govern the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to systemically refuse to seek a mandate in a part of it (i.e. the Northern Ireland bit). Moreover Labour’s sister party here – the SDLP – only appeals to Nationalists (and almost exclusively Catholics). It’s a Party whose elected representative cannot even bring themselves to refer to Northern Ireland as Northern Ireland. Instead they refer to “The North”, or “the region”.

The SDLP also takes diametrically opposite positions to Labour on local issues. For example it opposed the last Labour government’s positions on a host of issues (like uncapped domestic rates for Northern Ireland). It certainly is not the manifestation of the British Labour Party in Northern Ireland. Indeed most SDLP voters would be Conservative voters if they lived in Great Britain.

The Labour Party’s position is to deny left of centre pro-Union voters in Northern Ireland any opportunity to support the Party or vote for it. And yet it supports the Hillsborough Agreement which maintains the status quo of continuance of the Union with Britain so long as the majority so wish. In short, therefore, Labour’s position in terms of organisation and seeking a mandate is pro Irish Nationalist (as its sister Party is pro Irish Nationalist). That is the reason why the Party’s Unionist position for Scotland is fundamentally hypocritical – and why Jim Murphy needs to get his act together.

3 Responses to “Why the Labour Party and Jim Murphy are hypocrites on the Union”


  1. 1 Ralph Ashenhurst January 14, 2012 at 1:54 pm

    Excellent article, Jeff. The labour Party should organise and campaign in Northern Ireland but has consistently resisted that development. When I was a Labour parliamentary candidate I argued within the Party that Labour should have a presence in the Province but there was absolutely no interest. As you say, this leaves their policy towards the Union in doubt and does nothing to help normalise party politics here. Perhaps the decision by the Conservatives to organise in Northern Ireland might prompt further thought by Labour Party managers.

    • 2 Editor January 14, 2012 at 2:51 pm

      Ralph, thanks for your kind comments. We both live in hope that one day the Conservatives, Labour Party and LibDems might organise and contest elections in Northern Ireland. Only the normalisation and secularisation of our politics will make this a normal society and help dilute the scourge of sectarianism.


  1. 1 Labour u-turns to support govt. cuts « ATOS REGISTER OF SHAME Trackback on January 14, 2012 at 12:53 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 29 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers