Posts Tagged 'Democratic Unionist Party'

Bugger the Union: Official DUP Policy

English: Rt. Hon. Nigel Dodds MP speaks at the...

Nigel Dodds demands that the rest of the Union should have less money so the NI Executive can waste more.   (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The DUP has today demanded a reduction in spending by the Treasury on other parts of the Union in favour of an increase in spending in Northern Ireland.  That’s official.  I have it in black and white.

Nigel Dodds MP, in a media release dated today, has demanded  more money for Northern Ireland from the UK Treasury.  While the DUP/Sinn Fein Coalition has overseen the squandering of £Millions on policing associated with the flag riots, Mr Dodds has now asked the Treasury to increase the block grant to Northern Ireland.  The consequence, of course, if the Treasury agreed to this, would be that other government departments would have to pay the price.  So much for being in this together. So much for the Union. When it comes to allocation of a finite amount of Treasury funds, the DUP couldn’t care less about the rest of the Union.

According to Mr Dodds’ press release:

“It is essential that the NIO works closely with the Treasury to see what help can be given in the present circumstances to Northern Ireland. We are suffering from the severe cut backs in the Block Grant which have deprived the Northern Ireland Executive of vital funds in both revenue and capital.”

His release continues…

“It is more important than ever that adequate funding is available to tackle serious social and economic issues and the NIO and Whitehall has a grave responsibility to make their actions match their words. Addressing the issues of housing, educational under achievement, lack of employment and health inadequacies simply cannot be done properly by the Executive if it is being squeezed financially by the Whitehall Treasury.”

There you have it. No bargaining. No arguing about how the NI Executive might try to save or show examples of improved efficiency. No – just “give us more”.

But, thankfully, I think the Treasury will ignore him.

Casualties of causality

Nick Robinson

Nick Robinson (Photo credit: Matito)

The flag protests in Belfast have been a great opportunity for ‘experts’ to come up with various ’causes’ of the street protests/riots. The media – especially the BBC – has been at the vanguard of causality speculation.

One “cause” that has been elaborated on is the “fact” that “working class Protestants” have been pushed to the margins of the “political process”.  These Protestants, according to the argument, have been clinging on to their sense of identity but now that identity is under threat – given Belfast City Council’s decision to de-fly the flag.  But there are a myriad of other “causes” – from high levels of unemployment to the UVF stirring things up to disenchantment with the DUP to infiltration of protest groups by the BNP.

I have no idea which, if any, of these things is correct.  It’s almost certainly a mixture of them all combined with a great excuse for a bunch of kids or big kids to, in effect, wreck the place. There’s a great tradition in Northern Ireland for people to set fire to things, get pissed, and call it a party/riot. In fact I think it’s safe to predict a riot in Northern Ireland. One is pretty much sure to happen.  Especially when flags are flown or de-flown.

But that’s not really my point. My point is a more fundamental one. It’s the tendency on the part of journalists to always seek causes and to package these causes in convenient “packages” with some type of doom-laden punchline towards the end of the package.

Nick Robinson is the master of the package punch-line. He stands outside 10 Downing Street delivering his reports live on air (for no obvious reason – but implying he’s been standing with his ear to the door of #10 just before he came on air). And then he does that thing. He ends with a wonderfully contrived ending punch-line. A veritable tour de force – contrived to be poignant, somewhat rhetorical and displaying senior journo insight.  But, of course, we quickly dispense with all his punch-lines and rhetorical contrivances to that file of the mind labelled “of no real purpose – quickly discard.”

And that’s the point. These journo-contrived or expert-contrived summations, causalities and contrivances are all, when boiled-down, utter piffle.  We have no idea if the assumptions that are made by the self-appointed experts mean anything or contribute anything. It matters not a jot to the journalists if they are wrong – because by the time that becomes obvious we have forgotten what they’ve said.  Plus the journalists themselves (or the self-appointed experts) have moved on to come up with some other causality that no-one can prove.

Caleb Foundation Chickens-Out

Last night I popped along to a meeting of the Humanist Association of Northern Ireland (HUMANI), hoping to hear a presentation from the “Press Officer” of an organisation called the Caleb Foundation. For those of you who haven’t heard of Caleb, the organisation gained some degree of notoriety recently because of an article by Liam Clarke in the Belfast Telegraph.  The article questioned the relationship between the Caleb Foundation and the DUP – suggesting that it had spread a ‘web of influence’ across Stormont.

That would be worrying as Caleb has some truly bizarre viewpoints (and even more bizarre taste in font colours judging from its website).  For example in the “points for prayer” section Caleb encourages its followers to pray for the Royal Family and to “Pray that the Royal Family would turn to the Lord and seek to set a godly example to the nation.”  Hmm, prayers haven’t worked then…what with all those frolics in Las Vegas and topless sun-bathing.  Dirty birds.

More worryingly the organisation asks for prayer for “our ongoing campaign for balance and fairness in the Ulster Museum and at the Giant’s Causeway in relation to displays and presentations on the origins of the universe and of life.”  Not so much praying for “balance and fairness” than lobbying both visitor attractions to display and present mumbo jumbo.  And having, unfortunately, some degree of success.

Rumour has it that this oddball collection of (mostly male) flat-earth creationists have, indeed, quite a lot of support in Stormont.  It’s rumoured that Mervyn Storey, North Antrim MLA, and Nelson McCausland, Minister for Social Development, are among its supporters – and Chief Wizards within its Coven.

Anyway, the reason I popped along last night was to hear one of their number be verbally kebabed by a bunch of very intelligent and well-read Humanists.  But, unfortunately, the Caleb chap chickened-out (or was told by his masters to chicken-out).  Pity.

I asked Ian Deboys, Chairman of HUMANI, what he reckoned.  His interview is below.

The Centre-Right Gap

English: "Smash Sinn Fein, Vote DUP"...

Shinners and DUPs: United in Spending (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On Inside Politics on Sunday Fionnuala O’Connor had a pop at me (and Irwin Armstrong of the Conservatives) for suggesting that there was a yawning gap in centre-right politics in Northern Ireland. She seemed to be of the view that the Unionist Parties very much filled that void and there was no need for any new or revised political groupings – to address the political dispossessed.

The assumption that Northern Ireland’s Unionist Parties occupy the right-ground of the (normal) political spectrum is correct only if one thinks about social policy. But even there the Unionists are a rag-bag bunch. Indeed the Ken Maginnis debacle of last week is a good exemplar. Ken comes out with his anti-gay rampage. Then Mike Nesbitt has his hissy-fit, withdraws Ken’s whip, and thereby engages the wrath of his membership (most of whom are a bit iffy on gay rights).

In short, even the UUP is far from homogeneous on homosexuality – never mind the raft of other social issues.

But I wasn’t really thinking about social left-right positioning when I suggested there was a gap in the Northern Ireland political market.  And I wasn’t thinking about typical “Unionist” voters. Rather, I suspect that the most politically disengaged are fiscal Conservatives – business owners and professionals who want a smaller state – and certainly a smaller and more fiscally Conservative NI Executive.

The only choice on offer to such people (most of whom are pro-Union, regardless of religion) is the choice between fiscally profligate Nats (SDLP/Sinn Fein) or fiscally profligate Unionists (DUP or UUP or Alliance).  Hence my point (and Irwin’s on Hearts & Minds) that there is a Centre-Right void in Northern Ireland politics.

As I’ve stated here in other posts, I’m not sure to what extent the Cameron-led Conservative Party is setting any kind of example for local Centre-Right (potential) voters. The UK deficit is still too great.  Per capita, it is gargantuan in Northern Ireland (much bigger than RoI’s).  And UK borrowing is still at scandalous levels.  And “the cuts” have yet to affect Northern Ireland in any material way (except in terms of capital spend allocation). And the Assembly has increased local business rates – and attempted to introduce other stealth taxes – to make spending here even higher. No real moves have been made to address Northern Ireland private sector under-development.  Instead the default position is always to maintain spending.

Perhaps this clarifies things for Fionnuala.

Who will “Do an SNP” in Northern Ireland?

Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson...

Robinson needs to start cleansing his party of flat-earth nutters if he is to "do an SNP" Image via Wikipedia

I’m remarkably up-beat this morning. I have cast aside my normal grumpiness.  While the Northern Ireland election count has been a spectacular mess – the fact that we still have hordes of minor civil servants counting little slips of paper days after the vote is stupefying – the emerging result is good.

Let me explain.

There are a few interesting developments.  Let’s skip over all the constitutional garbage. All the parties are now Little Ulster parties. Even I am beginning to give up on any romantic notions I ever had that Northern Ireland could be ‘integrated’ and treated like, erm, Finchley.

That would be depressing but for a few developments. The first is that the UUP is pretty much dead. The Alliance Party is now a more important party and a vast swathe of middle-class voters is defecting from the UUP to Alliance. Alliance has become the middle class Unionist party (that doesn’t call itself Unionist and whose voter base is not exclusively Protestant). And it’s even beginning to behave a bit more like a sensible, thinking Party. David Forde was the only leader to face-up to the water charges issue and fess-up that he could countenance them (somebody has to pay for the investment needed).  Oh and it had by far the best election broadcast – all CGI – and Naomi Long’s narration was excellent.

Meanwhile, Peter Robinson made clear in the hustings that he wanted the ‘whole community’ to vote DUP. He was at pains to make clear that the constitutional issues were a done deal and that we needed to move on to more bread-and-butter (AKA secular) issues. Well said.  Pity though about all the new-earth creationist nutters in his Party and the fact that the majority of candidates are well-known bigots.

When I showed up at the polling station to cast my own vote (for Alliance by the way, reluctantly, given that Trevor Lunn was my only AP Assembly candidate) I was greeted by the usual horde of DUP leafleters and hangers-on – all of whom, I’m pretty sure, played flutes.

But all things considered things are looking better. The UUP is on the verge of being eradicated from the ballot paper (one less sectarian party to worry about). As I type there is a real prospect that Connal McDevitt may not be elected (one less hectoring know-all from the South to look at on television).  The Alliance Party has more popular support (meaning it will be forced to decide what it stands for in terms of real policy issues rather than merely be ‘nice’).  And the DUP needs to start thinking about how it cleanses itself of the rotten core of sectarianism at its heart in order to “do an SNP” and win an overall majority at Stormont.

Tantalisingly, there is a real prospect that the DUP – if it can, genuinely, cleanse itself of its sectarian baggage, might start eating into more of a cross-community voter base.  There is a prospect that we may see the emergence of two leading parties here in Northern Ireland that will vie for electoral dominance. I predict (and I appreciate that prediction is a mug’s game) that those two parties will be the DUP and Alliance.  Their challenge is to secure as large a swathe of the Sinn Fein vote as possible. Only Alliance and the DUP could achieve what the SNP has achieved in Scotland – because only they are unashamedly Northern Ireland grounded parties.

If either Party has such grand ambitions both need to start focusing on Sinn Fein’s achille’s heel: it’s crazy, confused, ultra-left-wing policies.

CCHQ Shafts Northern Ireland Conservatives

Michael Gove speaking at the Conservative Part...

Big on Society, Small on Principle (Image Wikipedia)

Conservative central office has never really cared for Conservatives who happen to reside in Northern Ireland. CCHQ has a history of being populated by people who think that people here only want to vote for sectarianism of one hue or another. Moreover, it has also employed its fair share of small-minded bigots.

This evening the Conservatives’ little-Ulster fossils have been trotted out to defend the policy of assuming the missionary position for the UUP. Laurence Robertson, who plays second fiddle to Owen Paterson, is probably closer to the DUP than he is to the UUP. But he’s certainly never been a friend of the Conservatives in Northern Ireland.

Barnoness Warsi, Tory Chairwoman, who favours a greater role for faith groups in the “Big Society” also appears to be fan of the Orange-soaked UUP. Big Society in Little Ulster. Great.

It has taken quite a while for the local Conservatives to see that Paterson, Robertson and CCHQ intended to systematically ignore them in seeking a deal with the rudderless and useless UUP. But, then again, the Conservative Party leadership is also in a coalition government with the rudderless and policy-devoid  Lib Dems. So this is familiar territory.

The UUP seems to be in gloating mode that it has stolen a march on local Conservatives. But, frankly, who would want to be involved in a Conservative Party that is devoid of any perceptible Conservative values?

The politics of this once great United Kingdom seems to lack any political party with any vestige of any political principle. Instead we have the politics of local and national populism. Our Executive is incapable of agreeing a budget while, nationally, our Prime Minister, like the one before him, prefers to schmooze with celebrities, as an alternative to articulating any coherent policy positions.

Oh and today the Big Society turned out to be a requirement for us all to shovel grit.

In a world that seems increasingly like a confederacy of dunces Sammy Wilson is beginning to sound rational. Now that is a worry.

Robbo and Secularism: I think not

Peter Robinson Visits Riverdale Primary School

Robinson with Young Earth Creationist Edwin Poots (Pic: DUP Flickr)

Peter Robinson was at pains to give the impression, when interviewed by Jim Fitzpatrick on the Politics Show today, that the DUP was going secular – appealing to all, apparently. He talked about the post-conflict Realpolitik that was all about issues that mattered to people, rather than the constitutional issue.

Now, what has motivated this new-found secularist political outlook could be debated. Perhaps he realized, after losing his East Belfast parliamentary seat, that old Unionism wasn’t cutting it any more. Moreover, Robinson’s personality is such that party-political reasons were sought to explain his Westminster demise, rather than any failings in his own personality. Apart from DUP apparatchiks, most people find him prickly, a tad sleazy, and vastly aloof and enervated from real world issues (having occupied a political cocoon for decades).

My particular issue with the man is his hypocrisy. He talks about the DUP’s desire to appeal to “Nationalists” and yet DUP rhetoric is the stuff of the social right and, often, the fiscal left. But an even more fundamental stopping block to secular progress is the bizarre, reactionary and anti-modernist views of his front bench team.

For example, how can Robinson seriously suggest that his Party could appeal to the modern minded when it has, within its midst, people of the ilk of the Reverend William McCrea, Nelson McCausland and Edwin Poots? After all, these intellectually depraved acolytes  help define the Party’s policy positions.

The “Reverend” William McCrea gave a graveside oration, in 1975, for two of the men responsible for the Miami Showband murders.   He has also shared platforms with Loyalist thugs and was convicted for riotous assembly in 1971. And yet Robinson, at this weekend’s DUP conference, made a particular point of highlighting his fondness and affection for McCrea – a man that many of us consider the most obvious manifestation of the DUP’s political psychosis.

Nelson McCausland, in his capacity as Culture and Arts Minister, made clear earlier in the year, that he felt the Ulster Museum should have exhibits that reflect the “views of the people of Northern Ireland” rather than support an understanding of science. He also believes that the Protestant people of Ulster descended from one of the lost tribes of Israel. (Very lost, I’d suggest, if it ended-up here).

Edwin Poots is a young-earth creationist (this means he believes God made the earth, and all the organisms therein, a few thousand years ago). He also opposes Darwinian evolutionary theory.

And yet, despite the rag-bag collection of looners in his political midst, Peter Robinson feels that his is the Party for Northern Ireland – representing an opportunity for a new secular dawn.

I think not.

Sheer Infuriating Hypocrisy

 

Peter Robinson at the Evolve Public Policy Forum

Image by DUP Photos via Flickr

 

It has taken me a full day to temper the invective I was planning to use in response to Peter Robinson’s contribution to the education debate. To those of you who wanted me to welcome the DUP leader’s new-found fondness for secular education – you’re about to be disappointed.

This man has been involved in one of the most divisive forces in Northern Ireland politics. The DUP has systematically propped-up the malevolent cultural apartheid that corrupts every corner of our civil society. But now he wants a single state education system. This man runs a political party and front bench team that wants creationist garbage taught in our schools and “intelligent design theory” featured in our museums. His party’s flat-earth perspectives and reactionary dogma is the utter antithesis of all that is right-minded and free-thinking. He fronts a rag-bag collection of bigots and political fossils that have helped put Northern Ireland on the international laughing stock map of small-minded mini nations.

His motivation for having a single state-funded education system, with funding removed for state schools, runs counter to logic and decency. Don’t get me wrong. I’m no advocate of Irish medium schools – I don’t believe that state funding should have been extended to such schools. They are patently absurd. However many schools that he describes as church schools attain some of the highest standards of academic excellence not just in Northern Ireland – but also in the United Kingdom.  To remove state funding from some of our finest schools would be a public scandal.

Few, if any, of our finest church schools are “faith schools” in a pejorative sense. None is permitted to discriminate on the grounds of religious faith when employing staff. All adhere to state recommended curricula. Most teach children good standards of citizenship and mutual respect.

As an Atheist I choose to send one of my my children to a Quaker school – a school that makes clear that it accepts children of parents of faith and those (like me and my wife) who have no faith. It also happens to be a school that attains incredibly high academic standards. It certainly does not force religious doctrine or liturgy on its pupils. In all respects it adheres to the academic guidelines defined by the Accord Coalition.

Indeed, while Northern Ireland’s decency and civil society have been undermined by politicians, clergy and the two-tribe mentality of the state, our teachers have been beacons of tolerance. Our much maligned education system has managed to produce wonderful, well rounded and decent children against all the odds. And our so-called “integrated system” has been at the vanguard, often, of the two-tribe mentality when some of our best schools have focused, instead, on producing some of the best academic standards in Western Europe.  State-funded grammar schools help produce the highest scores in GCSE and A Level results in the United Kingdom.

For readers that aren’t familiar with the aims of the coalition, here they are. And, for the benefit of Peter Robinson, I suggest that he encourages all state-funded schools to embrace these aims. Then we will, indeed, have one system of education.

Declaration of Aims of the Accord Coalition:

In a pluralist, multi-cultural society, the state should promote tolerance and recognition of different values and beliefs. Given the dangers of segregation and the importance of community cohesion we need schools that welcome all and are committed to non-discrimination. Schools should promote a culture of questioning, of knowledge, of respect and of exploration of values, where students develop their own identities and sense of place in the world. We believe all state-funded schools should:

1. Operate admissions policies that take no account of pupils’ – or their parents’ – religion or beliefs.

2. Operate recruitment and employment policies that do not discriminate on the grounds of religion or belief.

3. Follow an objective, fair and balanced syllabus for education about religious and non-religious beliefs – whether determined by their local authority or by any future national syllabus or curriculum for RE.

4. Be made accountable under a single inspection regime for RE, Personal, Social & Health Education (PSHE) and Citizenship.

5. Provide their pupils with inclusive, inspiring and stimulating assemblies in place of compulsory acts of worship.

And we commit to work with each other locally and nationally to turn public support for inclusive education into a campaign for reform that the government cannot ignore.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 50 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers