Posts Tagged 'Ulster Unionist'

Unionism: No Policy Needed

Mike Nesbitt

Mike Nesbitt doesn’t think the voters of Northern Ireland want any policies.(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In what, surely, must be one of the most depressing reads, Sam McBride’s interview of UUP “leader” Mike Nesbitt is a perfect encapsulation of the depravity of Northern Ireland politics.

McBride has provided an insight into the ‘thinking’ of a man who has managed to shrink the UUP into boneless form.  Rather than a Party for “decent people” Nesbitt sees Unionism as nothing more than a vehicle for Protestantism.  That is the extent of the policies needed to achieve the vote.  Orange.  Period.  Nothing else matters in Nesbitt’s political world.

Nesbitt believes that as long as he and his DUP cronies serve up the bad-smelling muck of sectarianism the voters will come out in their droves. The hapless Unionist candidates need to make the appropriate noises that roughly (and not at any detailed level, because detail is the stuff of policy and decision-making) correspond to some rough definition of Prod. So ideally some link to Ulster-Scotscrap “identity” nonsense, a whiff of Orange Order brethren garbage and an just a little squirt of Shinner bashing for good measure. (And all served up with a little scent-spray of anti-popery).

What Nesbitt seems to have missed is that no-one cares any more about this inanity-fest that passes for politics.  The reason people vote for the full-frontal lobe-rendered excuse for politics is that there’s nothing else on offer.  Voters are offered crap and vote for crap. Or don’t vote because they aren’t fond of crap in any of its forms.

So read this and weep folks.  This is the thinking that leads Unionism.

About time Baz ‘n’ John!

English: Basil McCrea MLA

Basil McCrea MLA finally jumps the brush. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Well, at last, Basil McCrea and John McCallister have jumped the brush together and defected to…well, we’re not quite sure yet…but they’ve left the Mad Auntie (AKA the UUP).

Rumour has it that a new local political party is in the offing.  A non-sectarian, secular, pro-Union party.

That seems to me to be a good idea.  In the context of devolution, and given the foot-shooting antics of the “national” political parties, that seems like a good plan.

I wish John and Basil every success.

The Centre-Right Gap

English: "Smash Sinn Fein, Vote DUP"...

Shinners and DUPs: United in Spending (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On Inside Politics on Sunday Fionnuala O’Connor had a pop at me (and Irwin Armstrong of the Conservatives) for suggesting that there was a yawning gap in centre-right politics in Northern Ireland. She seemed to be of the view that the Unionist Parties very much filled that void and there was no need for any new or revised political groupings – to address the political dispossessed.

The assumption that Northern Ireland’s Unionist Parties occupy the right-ground of the (normal) political spectrum is correct only if one thinks about social policy. But even there the Unionists are a rag-bag bunch. Indeed the Ken Maginnis debacle of last week is a good exemplar. Ken comes out with his anti-gay rampage. Then Mike Nesbitt has his hissy-fit, withdraws Ken’s whip, and thereby engages the wrath of his membership (most of whom are a bit iffy on gay rights).

In short, even the UUP is far from homogeneous on homosexuality – never mind the raft of other social issues.

But I wasn’t really thinking about social left-right positioning when I suggested there was a gap in the Northern Ireland political market.  And I wasn’t thinking about typical “Unionist” voters. Rather, I suspect that the most politically disengaged are fiscal Conservatives – business owners and professionals who want a smaller state – and certainly a smaller and more fiscally Conservative NI Executive.

The only choice on offer to such people (most of whom are pro-Union, regardless of religion) is the choice between fiscally profligate Nats (SDLP/Sinn Fein) or fiscally profligate Unionists (DUP or UUP or Alliance).  Hence my point (and Irwin’s on Hearts & Minds) that there is a Centre-Right void in Northern Ireland politics.

As I’ve stated here in other posts, I’m not sure to what extent the Cameron-led Conservative Party is setting any kind of example for local Centre-Right (potential) voters. The UK deficit is still too great.  Per capita, it is gargantuan in Northern Ireland (much bigger than RoI’s).  And UK borrowing is still at scandalous levels.  And “the cuts” have yet to affect Northern Ireland in any material way (except in terms of capital spend allocation). And the Assembly has increased local business rates – and attempted to introduce other stealth taxes – to make spending here even higher. No real moves have been made to address Northern Ireland private sector under-development.  Instead the default position is always to maintain spending.

Perhaps this clarifies things for Fionnuala.

Lund Resigns from NI Conservatives

EXCLUSIVE

Just a few days after the (re)launch of the NI Conservatives a leading member of the local Party has resigned. John Lund has forwarded me a copy of his resignation letter sent to the local Conservative leadership, copied to Emma Pidding, Chairman of the National Convention of the Conservative Party.

In his letter John makes clear that he fails to understand the new NI Conservatives grouping and questions the constitutional basis of it – in the absence of any membership vote to dissolve the existing Conservatives in NI.  He also hints that the NIO may attempt to exert undue influence on the NI Conservatives. Indeed he suggests that the NIO is likely to suppress the development of the local Party.

John Lund was actively involved in the attempts to create a new centre-right grouping – drawing members from both the UUP and Conservatives.  Indeed the move was publicised on the Conservative NI site in December.  Now it appears that irreconcilable differences have caused John to resign.

This does not augur well for the future of the new, supposedly revamped, local Conservatives.

Does Jim Nicholson Care?

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...

Jim Nicholson MEP doesn’t tweet any more…

If twitter accounts are anything to go by, then Jim Nicholson, the Ulster Unionist Party’s lone representative in Europe, doesn’t really seem to care. His last tweet was on August 15, 2009.  The Euro elections were also in 2009.  Since his re-election he hasn’t much bothered to tweet.  Prior to his last tweet on August 15 he tweeted 196 times.  Since then, nothing.

I suspect the main reason for this is that Nicholson has never actually mastered the tweet. I suspect someone was tweeting for him. His twitter account links to VoteforChangeNI.com – a site that was created by the Conservative Party and UUP. But the domain, no doubt, was not renewed.

However, there is something bizarrely eloquent about this dumbed twitter account.  The last tweet, with a dead link, says simply, “Labour letting down NI’s Pensioners.” And then Mr Nicholson says nothing else. Struck mute and his 1,116 followers left hanging, waiting for the next instalment, the next rajor-sharp tweet that never comes.

But the question hanging in the sky, with the birds, is does Mr Nicholson know he has a twitter account – and does he care?  I suspect not on both counts. And why does he not care? The following extract might help explain.

“MEPs are paid an average £83,000 per year, compared to MPs in Britain, who have an annual salary of £65,738. They also receive a daily “subsistence allowance” of £265, they can be refunded up to £3,600 per year for other travel outside their own country, and be reimbursed for up to 24 return journeys within their own country. Members also receive up to £242,000 annually in staff salaries and office expenses and benefit from a generous health care and pension system. It is estimated that an MEP can cost around £400,000-a-year.” 

STOP PRESS: He plans to run again!

Another UUP Leader

Mike Nesbitt

More of the same. Mike Nesbitt is one of the hopefuls to take over the UUP "chalice". Image via Wikipedia

So Tom has finally thrown in the towel and we are to have another UUP leader.

Alex Kane does a good job over at the News Letter in outlining the likely contenders and just how poisoned a chalice the UUP leadership is. Although I’d question whether the UUP is even up to a chalice these days. More a nice cuppa tea with a ham sandwich (made with pan-loaf and margarine).  Served in a nice, fusty Orange Hall.

The UUP has been dying for years. And, according to the various whispers I’m receiving via the bongo drums of the the political anorak class (the metaphors are all over the place in that sentence, sorry) defections will continue in the coming weeks. Some big-hitter UUP members, I’m told.  Although I wasn’t aware there were any of those left.

As Alex points out in his article, the new-fangled NI Conservative thingy is due to be launched in a few weeks. I gather that the plan is that this will be pitched as very much a cross-community entity. Some Alliance types have been sniffing around it and the grandees of the Conservative Party in London will publicly bless the thing. However, as I’ve written before, without a better leadership roster in front of it the new Party will fizzle little brighter than than a new-leadered UUP.

The problem is that the new political order of DUP/Shinner coalition is bedding down. The two Parties are made for each other because they both want the same things i.e. more power wrested from Westminster.  Collectively the Dupshinners are the manifestation of Ulster-Irish nationalism – the NI equivalent of the Scots Nats.

The DUP and Shinners are politically melded like the two tubes in an epoxy-resin kit. And tit-for-tat niceness is growing.  Soon we’ll have an announcement that Marty will meet some Royal on the next visit and there will be cries of “Wow” from the establishment and then Peter Robbo will arrange to wear a big green hat on St Paddy’s Day. And then Marty will join Garvaghy Road LOL or something. The whole consensus thing gets more and more ridiculous by the minute.

The only means of breaking this merry-go-round green and orange trading-off is to do something to undermine it.  The UUP is just too stupid and lacking in talent to know where to start and the NI Conservatives haven’t got sufficient media attention or leadership savviness.

It’s now Up to the Tories…

Is this how the new Party logo might look?

After a few weeks thinking time, the UUP leader, Tom Elliott, has responded to Conservative Chairman Lord Feldman’s letter – the one that suggested the the UUP should wind-up and go home.

As expected, Elliott has dismissed Feldman’s suggestions - rather than the UUP Party executive.

So, it’s now over to the Conservatives to do something.  And that something, it would appear, would be to establish a new Northern Irish flavoured right-of-centre political party with formal ties to the Conservative Party in London but with local leadership and electoral ambitions.

As I’ve said in the past I would wish this new organisation success.  But I would hope that – from launch – the organisation sets out a secular, non-sectarian stall, free from the baggage of the past. The new Party needs to define itself very quickly as something fresh, different, cross-community and attractive.  It will need a confident and articulate voice and it will need to be well organised and well-funded – two qualities the local Conservatives never really achieved.

I’ll be watching 2012 developments with interest.

Conservatives Call for Winding-Up of UUP – Exclusive

Conservative Party Logo

The Conservative Party Chairman has written to the UUP recommending the winding-up of the UUP next year.

I was today forwarded a letter that has been sent to all members of the Conservative Party in Northern Ireland.  The letter suggests that the Conservative Party chairman, Lord Feldman of Elstree, has addressed a letter to the Ulster Unionist leader, Tom Elliott, outlining an offer to “move Conservatism forward in Northern Ireland.”

The letter to local Conservative Party members continues, “This offer will involve the dissolution of the UUP early next year and the formation of a new Conservative led party, under the constitution of the national Conservative party, which will operate along the lines of the parties in Scotland and Wales.

“This offer is being made with the express approval of the Prime Minister, the Board of the Conservative Party, as well as the Chairman of the Northern Ireland Conservative Party, Irwin Armstrong.

“It proposes a Northern Ireland Conservative party which can reach out to everyone in Northern Ireland, irrespective of background and tradition, unencumbered by the conflict and divisions which mark our past.”

If this move truly means the winding-up of the Ulster Unionist Party – then this is a move to be welcomed.  However, I look forward to hearing the response from the UUP leadership.

The move almost certainly means that a large cohort of UUP members has broken ranks with the UUP leadership and now wants to do business with the Conservative Party – while building a new local, non-sectarian identity.  That, also, is to be welcomed.

Read coverage inspired by this post…

Dale & Co

Slugger O’Toole

BBC Northern Ireland

Conservatives Running in Assembly Elections

It looks likely that local Conservatives are to be required to be nice to the UUP in the Assembly elections next year.

According to Mark Devenport over on his blog, “Conservative HQ will have to sort this one out – watch out for a fudge which might see some local Tory candidates running, albeit with pledges of non-hostility and mutual voting transfers.”

That is an outcome that should not be tolerated by local Conservatives. It’s the political equivalent of being tethered by the ankle to a crazy aunt – but still expected to attend the ball.

Why Tom Elliot’s Unionism Doesn’t Matter

  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because most people ignore him
  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because most people take the Union for granted and there’s no need to go on about it
  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because Unionism doesn’t get anything done – it’s a pointless political position when the constitutional arrangement is no longer under threat
  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because it doesn’t help us understand Tom’s political ideology or how he proposes tackling the most important political issues
  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because Tom doesn’t really matter that much – nor his Party
  • Tom Elliott’s Unionism doesn’t matter because Tom is the worst kind of political dinosaur – one who doesn’t see the writing on the wall

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 50 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers